AS TRUTH ABOUT FUKUSHIMA
RADIATION EMERGES, JAPANESE AUTHORITIES STRUGGLE TO MAINTAIN COVER-UP
The cat is out of the
bag, as more evidence continues to emerge proving that clean-up workers at the
stricken Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power facility in Japan deliberately covered
up high radiation readings at the order of their superiors. And as more people
become aware of this disturbing fact, Japanese authorities are trying to
maintain the facade that the cover-up was an isolated incident and that there
was not a larger conspiracy to hide legitimate radiation readings from the
public.
The Japanese news source
Asahi Shimbun (AS) reports that a senior official working for Build-Up, a
subcontractor hired during the Fukushima clean-up efforts, has admitted to
instructing his workers to wear lead coverings over their dosimeters in order
to shield accurate radiation readings. Dosimeters measure an individual's
exposure to radiation, and indicate when it is no longer safe to be in the
presence of a radiation source.
Recordings uncovered
from a December 2 conversation between the official and his employees reveals
that he coaxed them to use the lead coverings by claiming that he had used them
many times before without issue. He also apparently told them that they would
have to use them in future clean-up efforts as well, and implied that they
should get used to using them now.
According to AS, the
senior official also came up with an alibi that the workers could use to
explain the coverings, should anyone inquire about the unusual presence of tape
on their torn radiation protection suits. All the bases were covered, in other
words, which was enough to convince four of the workers to go along with the
plan.
Senior official's
confession makes no sense, appears to be even more cover-up
But now that the media
has blown the lid off the story, the senior official in question is now claiming
that the incident was isolated, and that he came up with it himself on the fly
in order to protect him and his team from radiation. What? Even though this
explanation makes absolutely no sense, as dosimeters cover up radiation
readings, not the radiation itself, this is the story he is now telling, and
the mainstream media appears to be buying it.
When asked about this
obviously contradictory statement, the senior official followed up his answer
with another nonsensical one about how his workers were new at the job, and how
he thought that telling them to wear lead coverings over the only thing that
would have alerted them to dangerous levels of radiation would somehow quell
their fears. Again, this explanation makes no sense, and appears to point to a
cover-up as to who really instructed him and his team to wear the lead
coverings.
So a senior official
takes the hit for a cover-up intended to deceive the public into thinking that
radiation levels were lower than they really were at the Fukushima plant. When
asked to explain what he was thinking when he made this decision, he offers up
senseless explanations that make no sense, and insists that he was the only one
involved, for some unknown reason.
Are you Suspicious? You
be the judge.
Sources for this article
include:
JAPAN OFFERED TO ENRICH
URANIUM FOR IRAN
3/11 was Japan’s 9/11
caused by US Army, controlled by Israel who are working for the money prophet,
the Rothschild and their Crown Council of 13 tsunami nuclear bomb
There was no actual
quake damage to Japan and the original Japanese seismic charts which prove
there was no 9.0. The linked public records prove that the very real tsunami
which destroyed everything in it’s path could not have been natural. The fact
that what happened in Japan did not occur naturally has been very well
documented by a skilled investigator, who spent hundreds of hours getting to
the bottom of this story.
This report includes
classified photos and the schematics for Fukushima, as well as the ORIGINAL
seismic records to support it’s claims.
1. Reactor 3 is
completely missing,
2. Reactor 4 is Building
7, demolished by explosives.
3. That the destruction
of the facility is so severe it could only have been accomplished with nuclear
weapons.
4. That nuclear
weapon(s) were placed inside of the reactor containment(s) disguised as
security cameras installed under contract this year by Arava based security
firm Magna BSP (Arava is a district around Dimona, not a city.) Their “security
cameras” weighed over 1,000 pounds and were the size and shape of gun type
nuclear weapons.The reason Magna BSP gave for the odd shape, enormous weight,
and giant proportions of their cameras was that they were stereoscopic. A
stereoscopic camera could be plausible at an airstrip, where the camera would
need depth perception out miles, but not indoors where focal lengths are short.
Depth perception going out miles could also be accomplished with two separately
mounted cameras weighing only a few pounds; the giant thousand pounder is a
dead giveaway. Why this giant thing, when smaller nukes are possible? Nuclear
weapons always produce a certain amount of heat, and if a small design was used
it would be obvious the “camera” was warm, even when turned off and sitting on
the shelf. This would cause questions to be asked, especially in a nuclear
power facility. The enormous size and weight helped conceal the decay heat.
In fact, the quake was a
bold faced lie, packing a political agenda. The proof goes beyond the linked
Japanese chart. Please note – the date listed at the top is the date of
compilation, Japan has thousands of seismic stations run by numerous
organizations, and they take time to merge into one final report. That is the
date listed at the top of this compilation (March 15), and there is a shill out
there who can’t figure this out, a fact which should be obvious because the
main seismograph in this report is dated and timed to the quake, and is a match
for the lower resolution seismograms in this large compilation.
(This is by far one of
the most disturbing articles I have compiled on the Fukushima meltdown issues.
I think this deserves to be shared massively.)
It took them three
hundred years and trillions of dollars to build a theatre of darkness, yet the
light of only one match can burn it down. Do not let this light go out, ARCHIVE
AND POST!!!
3/11 was Japan’s 9/11.
It’s all documented folks!
NEW ULTRA HIGH
RESOLUTION FUKUSHIMA PHOTOS
(make sure you expand
them to see them clearly, and post them and everything else EVERYWHERE)
...And now, I will bite.
This is what I did not want to publish, but I know it has to be true. Call this
creative journalism, because I never called Netanyahu, but here is the most
rational conclusion I can draw, based on all info gathered so far including the
original not faked seismic data.
I honestly believe Japan
is being held a nuclear hostage. It all makes sense.
1. Japan offers to
enrich uranium for Israel’s GREAT SATAN, Iran
2. Immediately, Israel
sets up front companies masquerading as security companies, and one of them
succeeds in getting a security contract at a Japanese nuclear facility. 4
months later the Dimona Dozen shows up, and under the cover of a security
contract gets unlimited access to the heart of Fukushima. They plant the virus,
install real cameras outside the facility, and functional poorly disguised nuke
cameras inside the facility. In addition to this, they install an unauthorized
data connection to allow control of all the guts of the facility via the virus.
(they admitted to this connection, as discussed later on this page)
3. After installing
Stuxnet and the nukes they scram
4. Israel waits for one
of the many natural quakes in Japan to provide cover for a tsunami bomb, and
they already have it at the bottom of the Japan trench. VLF communications are
established with the bomb to penetrate the water. David in Dimona gets seismic
reading from Japan. 6.67 in progress, BOOM. (new evidence shows the quake most
likely was not natural)
Tsunami comes in, swamps
stuxnet infected power plant, direct video feed from legitimate cameras
security company installed gets to David via totally unauthorized channel, and
David knows just when to cut the generators off. Others on the team do all they
can to counteract measures taken by the employees at Fukushima, who are unaware
an attack is taking place and do not understand why everything is going crazy
5. Israeli Prime
Minister calls Japan, and says TAKE THAT for offering help to Iran, and you
know, there are FIVE MORE NUKES in the ocean off the coast of Japan, and we are
going to set those off and destroy your coastal cities if you do not forget
that 6.67, and say it was a 9 to cover for tsunami effects. AND NOW we are
going to make your people DEMAND you move away from nuclear power so you can
NEVER threaten us like that again. We are BLOWING UP FUKUSHIMA DIIACHI and you
are going to go along with whatever story we tell you to. SO THERE!!
6. David and his pals
close ALL valves to the reactors via the remote data link they admitted to
installing, and put them full throttle, to melt them down while the virus keeps
control room readouts displaying false info, like nothing is going on even
though the place is coming apart. After enough mayhem ensues to provide
plausibility, they set off planted nukes and blow the place sky high.
And even if the quake
was real, there are nukes that can reach an 8.4. Close enough. Though I have
yet to work out the final details, I probably have enough to hang them because:
1. I got the real
seismic data that proves beyond a doubt the quake is not what we were told and
was in fact an inland 6.8, (calculated higher than the seismogram due to the
triangulated true epicenter being a little higher) which would get noticed but
not feared in quake ridden Japan.
2. Numerous referenced
sources prove Stuxnet really was written by Israel
3. Japan really did
offer to enrich Uranium for Iran, and Israel has been documented to have
attempted to destroy the reactor in Iran, and probably did. Japan contributing
to Iran’s nuclear future would make them just as much an enemy to Israel as
Iran. Israel would want them taken out.
4. It is documented that
a team from Israel, with a history consisting only of working in Israeli
defense, got unlimited access to a Japanese nuclear facility, which then went
boom
5. Reactor 4 had been
defueled and proven disassembled, and therefore no explosion there was
possible. What should have happened at reactor 4, if anything at all? the fuel
pools should have melted down and caught fire once the water boiled off from
lack of recirculation AT Worst, and badly contaminated the containment
structure, NOTHING ELSE. NO explosions, NOTHING ELSE. Reactor 4 is building 7,
PERIOD. Why did an explosion there happen that was so severe it blew the outer
containment walls (4 feet thick) and inner containment walls that were much
thicker? Reactor 4 is reportedly now in danger of falling over. HOW?
6. The Japanese
government is going along with the story of a scientifically proven false 9.0.
There is a reason, and my guess is that Israel has made threats to wipe out
Japanese coastal cities with additional tsunamis if the government of Japan
speaks a word of what went on, there should be no reason for Japan to go along
with this other than a continued threat.
Is it not interesting
this “quake” reportedly happened at the bottom of the Japan trench, which would
be perfect for hiding an atomic bomb blast?
Is the Department of
Homeland Security trying to keep American industries (and nuclear facilities) in
the dark about Stuxnet? After Fukushima fell victim to unwary operators, I
would think such a conference would be a TOP priority here! The genie is out of
the bottle. It is a fact that the writers of Stuxnet intend to use it. So
cancelling a well-researched conference about the vulnerabilities of the
Siemens SCADA system to Stuxnet in the name of “keeping hackers from getting
info” seems to me like an effort to keep the threat alive. Ignore the fluff at
the beginning, and read the “About TakeDownCon” summary near the bottom so you
know what they actually cancelled rather than settle for the no-panic fluff at
the beginning. This is SERIOUS. I fear that by the time the Hacker Halted
conference happens in October, the summer of disaster may have passed. And if
it has not, I bet any discussion of Stuxnet at Hacker Halted will also be
cancelled. Stuxnet is too good a toy for a very powerful group to let go of.
Something is fishy here.
Other publications
picked up this story now, and are poo pooing the issue into the ground. They
are obviously attempting to morph responsibility for Stuxnet style attacks away
from Israel so that they can regain cover and use the weapon as a false flag
tool to destroy internet freedom. This is where they are going to go with this
– count on it, and when the disasters happen there will be a cozy blanket of
lies shielding Israel from all blame. Never forget, THIS IS THEIR BABY, NEVER
FORGET. Prior to them doing this, WE NEVER HEARD OF IT.
About “prompt
criticality” – As it turns out, Arnie Gundersen, mister “prompt criticality”
with regard to the massive explosion at #3 is very poorly credentialed. His
crowning achievement was playing with a 100 watt open water tank reactor in a
classroom for a short period of time.
Fuel rods are only 20
percent fissionable, sometimes even less, and until you reach over 90 percent
purity in U238 and about 70 percent purity in Plutonium NO “prompt criticality”,
is possible in ANY case no matter how much of it you have laying around.
Furthermore, even with 100 percent pure material you need a precision trigger
slamming or crushing material together to get a detonation. Even if 100 percent
pure material is slammed together at high speed, if it is not done right you
will get only a nuclear “sputter” that pushes the pieces apart, and no
detonation. Nukes are hard to do! Why have so many of us seemed to have
forgotten that nuclear detonations are hard to accomplish? The “prompt
criticality” in spent fuel story is something I would have expected to hear
from an Ewok praying to a gold robot. I can’t believe even a scammer would have
the guts to suggest it, let alone allow it to be spread around in his name. For
an explanation for the explosions, just look at the cameras the Dimona Dozen
brought in. If someone is waving a degree as an anchor for this “prompt
criticality” bull hockey, remember that there is such a thing as a paper
trained idiot and if you look into Gundersen’s background you will discover he
is barely that, with his ONLY hands on experience outside a classroom being an
intern at a nuclear facility two years before he got his degree!
If the mainstream media
wanted the facts, why did they pick this guy? Because he said what they wanted,
truth be damned.
“We at Vermont Yankee
are well acquainted with Arnie and his exaggerations. He plays to a public and
a legislature that has zero knowledge of nuclear power or engineering and is
willing to accept any negative claim as truth.” And since he gave an impossible
“prompt criticality” explanation which diverted attention away from the only
real explanation for the magnitude of the explosion at #3 – a nuke, they gave
him a ton of air. Enough said.
Arnie Gundersen’s
consulting firm, which has only him (no employees yet or ever, and therefore
it’s easy to be “senior engineer”) was curiously founded within months of the
release of the spider man villain Critical Mass, who, as Spider man’s fourth
grade classmate went by the name of ARNIE GUNDERSEN. Critical Mass had the ability
to project explosions from his fingertips. Hmm, perhaps THAT gave birth to the
“prompt criticality” in a 20% fuel pool when 90+ percent is needed for an
explosion of any sort no matter what the circumstance? If you need 90 or more
percent and you have only 20 percent, THE LAWS OF PHYSICS WILL BE OBEYED.
Folks, In perfect form, the scamming media hunted out a fraud and rammed him
down your throats. Arnie Gundersen has a phony company and was inspired in his
fraud by a Spider Man comic. NO ONE at the college Arnie supposedly attended
even heard of him, I went down that rabbit hole and the man is a mystery.
This post has been
greatly improved via input from readers. If you have information proving any
points wrong, or think something should be clarified, as well as new info that
can further solidify the case, contact me. Thanks!
The article about
Fukushima follows.
The following section
covers the Fukushima disaster
Published April 29, 2011
Fukushima was
impossible. The swamping of the generators by the tsunami was irrelevant,
because the real emergency backup systems are driven by steam from the reactors
themselves. No electricity is needed to operate three separate emergency
systems at each reactor, each of which will keep a reactor safe even if only
one works. Interesting it is then that all 9 non electrical backup systems
across the three fueled reactors failed. This is technically impossible outside
of willful intent, and was likely the result of a Stuxnet virus attack.
Stuxnet was designed
specifically to target Siemens SCADA controllers and is most effective at
tampering with fluid control systems. The centrifuges it attacked in Iran were
ideal. So are the fluid control systems at a nuclear facility. Oil refineries
are equally at risk, Stuxnet is most dangerous when affecting a system which
needs to control the flow of any liquid, be it hydraulic, for cooling, or
combining chemicals. Stuxnet is documented to have been produced by the Israeli
Defense Forces, for the purpose of destroying any industrial system that can be
destroyed by improper fluid flow.
Magna BSP, a Dimona
based company with no history outside of IDF contracts prior to Fukushima has a
suspiciously short domain history despite a 10 year claimed history. Magna BSP
had a full time internet linked two way connection to the Fukushima reactor
room(s) all the way through the disaster. They told TEPCO about that connection
on March 15 (after everything blew sky high) via an article printed in the
Jerusalem Post. Why did Manga BSP wait until everything was blown sky high to tell
Tepco the data link existed, and then did not tell them face to face? I find it
hard to believe that TEPCO would not have been interested in viewing a reactor
that was about to explode. It seems impossible that Tepco would not have wanted
to view the reactor, and probably did not ask because the link was kept a
secret. It is a simple fact that internet connections are never allowed inside
a reactor’s containment. The connection was mentioned in the Jerusalem Post
AFTER the destruction was finalized.
Stuxnet has two modes,
random and administrative. It can be administered to optimize the damage and
can also transmit setup information and industrial system information to a
remote computer. Once installed on the host system via a flash drive it causes
that system to violate it’s normal security protocols and internet
administration becomes possible if a connection exists. Tampering is not
visible on the control room readouts, because Stuxnet learns what “normal”
looks like and keeps the temperature, pressure, and other readouts within
normal limits so that the operators are oblivious to the destruction happening
in secret. Stuxnet appeared in Japan in June of 2010, shortly after Magna BSP
arrived. Remote administration mode can be adjusted on demand to suit any need.
No doubt the people at Fukushima sat there in idle mode thinking all was well
until something screamed or went boom and at that point it would be too late to
do anything other than cry.
I am a lifer in the
types of control systems Fukushima and its clone, TVA owned Browns Ferry have.
BOTH have been upgraded to modern Siemens controllers running the Supervisory
Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) system Stuxnet was designed to attack;
upgrades are the norm in any major facility. On many blogs people say the
controls were old and therefore Stuxnet immune; they are out of touch or have
no knowledge of industrial control systems.
The explosions was a sabotage
The diesel generators
were not out in the open as we were led to believe, they were in fact located
in the basements of the turbine buildings which were sealed off and never
significantly flooded. One of them stayed running the entire time, but the
electrical switch gear attached to it disconnected it for an unexplained reason
which made it useless. Each of the backup generators at Fukushima was capable
of running 14,000 households each, which means they had to be over ten
megawatts each. It is obvious then that Fukushima was set up to survive on only
ONE of 13 backup generators, and ONE did keep running. One would be many times
larger than needed to run last ditch backup systems at all reactors, but would
not keep business as usual. But that is not the real story, which is that even
others which were high and dry stopped as well.
I hypothesize that the
ONE generator that kept running was kept as a lone reserve, never hooked up to
a SCADA controller. Why did the switch gear disconnect a working generator? That
is the type of thing Stuxnet was designed to do. On top of these things,
emergency generators arrived on scene within 9 hours, before anything bad
happened at all but were not able to provide power because the switch gear
would not let them. This deceptively written report from the World Nuclear
Association contains all this information, but it is presented in a way which
will cause you to overlook these things if you are not careful while reading
it. This report contains accurate information presented in a very misleading
way, which will protect the liars who wrote it – they actually did speak the
truth here but in a way it would be missed by virtually anyone. Study the facts
presented here with the full ramifications of those facts in mind, not their shallow
misleading conclusions.
From this report you can
get:
1. The generators never
got submerged – you have to connect the dot between them being in a contained
area and the tsunami thereby not being able to get to them. Some water got into
one of the turbine buildings where several were located and flooded the lowest
point in that building to a depth of 4 feet, which means that even if the
generators were on the floor at the lowest point they likely would not have
been swamped because they are too big – the water would not get past the
footings. Perhaps a one megawatt generator would have swamped; certainly not
one of the big diesels, which were, according to this report enough to run
14,000 homes each. In addition to this, there were several generators in a
second location that never got flooded at all. One of these generators kept
running but was not able to get power into the facility because the switchgear
prevented it.
2. You have to have
watched the robot videos, which clearly show the switch gear that malfunctioned
after the tsunami never got wet – there was a non-tsunami reason for the
failure. Also look at the high resolution photos referenced below. There is no
switch gear for the diesel generators outside the facility, it is all indoors in
areas higher than the water got. Remember that there was no emergency when the
off site generators arrived, which means that they could work efficiently to
get things up and running. With my experience in this area, Assuming it DID get
soaked, a complete replacement of high capacity switch gear should only take an
afternoon if done with an emergency attitude. A truck mounted crane or a
forklift does all the heavy lifting and the stuff is modular. In every major
facility there are spares galore. It is not that hard to make the terminations.
A worst case scenario could have been addressed before things went horribly
awry, that is, unless a virus did not let the new switch gear activate either.
It would take days to conclude a virus was messing things up. You would not
expect that. I am sure there is a LOT we never heard about.
3. That batteries held,
leaving only a one hour gap in time where there was no power present to run
things before adequate off site power drove into the facility on the road all
nice and ready to hook up, but was denied to by switch gear which this report
says was swamped but that is likely an assumption because swamped switchgear
could have been replaced even before the batteries died. The fact that the
offsite generators were able to be driven into the facility also proves that
other lies told about the earthquake in general – employees leaving only to
find cracks in the road so bad they had to walk home; Why? Why lie like this?
AT LEAST this report has some modicum of honesty.
4. You have to look at
the chart that shows the thermal output of the reactors 8 hours after the
earthquake, which is when the batteries running the electrical cooling pumps
died, the output at that time was less than 20 megawatts from each reactor,
which means that they would not have had troubles before the offsite generators
were hooked up to restore power if it was not denied by what I suspect was
stuxnet infected switch gear. The real critical time is in the first 3 hours
after shutdown.
3. Reactor 3 exploded
entirely, yet this reactor had the most functional backup systems. At least
this report says the explosion remains “unexplained”. Perhaps those who wrote
the report should take a look at this for an answer.
4. The reactors are
stated to be an “early 1960′s design” apparently to mislead people into
believing they were outdated even when installed. This was not the case. Their
design was an early 60′s concept but in fact a late 60′s design, and since
installation takes years, what more could you expect in the early 70′s? The
reactors were in fact a very safe design. This report at least states that the
facility was very well updated. Identical reactors at TVA owned browns ferry
have been certified safe and licensed to operate through the year 2035. These reactors
were also converted over to run the Siemens Scada system. The reactors at
Fukushima were not garbage. The fastest cars in production still function on a
late 1800′s concept.
I hypothesize that the
situation at Fukushima is not being properly assessed by facility controllers
because STUXNET is STILL giving false readings to the control panels, readings
which obviously have to be false because they show containment pressure when
confidential leaked photographs prove beyond a doubt no containment exists AT
ALL at reactor 3. There is not even a reactor there.
This report is perfectly
inaccurate with regard to reactor 3 containment. Perhaps the people who wrote
this report have not actually looked at the facility or seen the confidential
photographs.
This report supports
what I have said here entirely. It was written by an experienced reactor
operator. I found this on May 10. I was absolutely right!
Each reactor has 8
separate emergency backup systems, each capable of saving the reactor on it’s
own. Three are designed to function perfectly if all power is lost and even the
generators fail. Fukushima did not need any electrical systems operating AT ALL
to keep itself from blowing up, when power is lost steam from the reactors is
automatically diverted from the generator turbines to two totally separate
steam turbines connected to totally separate water pumps needing only reactor
steam to power them. Even that backup system has dual redundancy, only one of
the two is needed for the job. But the valves which have to activate to
re-divert the steam, all 6 valves on a total of 3 fueled reactors, eventually
failed to. At reactors 1 and 3 these systems worked, but switched off at
reactor 1 within an hour and off at reactor 3 after running for more than two
days. No one has been able to explain why these systems switched off all by
themselves, when they need a powered command to switch off. At reactor 2 they
were never allowed to activate. This can only happen if the control system
tells them to shut off or stay off, absent intervention from the controller
they automatically and seamlessly switch cooling modes to passive rather than
electrical.
Some readers may
remember that the real issue at Fukushima was malfunctioning valves, and the
need to get someone past the radiation to open them. These are the valves that
were spoken of. Because Stuxnet kept the readouts normal, no one knew this
system did not function until major problems happened as a result flooding the
area where the valves are with radiation. This prevented last ditch efforts
(running and cutting the wires). One automatic valve jamming and mechanically
failing would be a surprise,6 failing can only be sabotage.
In addition to this,
another completely independent separately piped backup with an entirely
different electronic decision tree which injects borated water at a pre charged
3,500 PSI into the reactor to irrevocably shut down all chain reactions
(reactor rebuild required) also simultaneously failed at all 3 fueled reactors.
The borated water systems have explosive operated valves so reliable that even
one out of 3 failing would be a ten thousand to one possiblity, if that. The reliability
of the borated water systems is technically theoretically assured. All three
failing at the same time at Fukushima can only mean sabotage.
High pressure in all of
the reactors proves the quake did not damage any of the infrastructure at
fukushima because any leaks would have let the pressure go. In addition to
this, the seismic readings at Fukushima were 6.07. Fukushima was designed to
handle being at the epicenter of an 8.
The media keeps harping
about how all the water went away. It only did because these three backup
systems were prevented from cooling the reactor which caused the water to boil
off and never be replaced. High pressures were talked about constantly in the
press; This means beyond a doubt that all 6 steam powered backup systems were
intact, and all 3 borated water systems were intact also because if they were
not the pressure would have escaped through them. Absent emergency backup
control power keeping the virus alive; (control power Magna BSP admitted was
there the whole time by mistake when they said their cameras and supporting
computers captured the explosions and maintained a data link) the valves which
control these systems would have opened when the generators failed and there
would have been no disaster. 3 worst case scenarios where all 9 automatic
valves across 9 separate emergency backup systems are held shut by the
controller when no power should have been present to prevent them from
activating can only mean sabotage.
A historical perspective
of Fukushima shows the hydrogen blasts were bogus.
Hydrogen blasts could
not have damaged Fukushima so badly, this is a media fed lie. If hydrogen gas
alone mixed with air could produce blasts strong enough to blow reactor
containment buildings to pieces, which are among the strongest structures on
earth (exceeded in strength only by ones like Hoover Dam,) then hydrogen gas
filled bombs would be the prime military option. In reality, the Three Mile
Island incident proved hydrogen ignition in open air after reactor meltdown is
likely to only scare employees, while causing no damage at all to the facility,
as was the case there. It is extremely important to know the differences
between the boiling water reactor design and the design of Chernobyl. At
Chernobyl, a hydrogen blast DID cause destruction of the facility, but it was
because the reactor design caused hydrogen and oxygen at a perfect ratio to
ignite at thousands of PSI inside the reactor pressure vessel. That’s a big
difference from hydrogen alone igniting in relatively oxygen starved open air
at one atmosphere (14.5 PSI). The difference would be similar to the difference
between a small firecracker and a case of dynamite; there were many orders of
magnitude lower blast potential at Fukushima.
Just to be absolutely
safe after the Three Mile Island incident, many nuclear facilities installed
hydrogen hard vent stacks hooked directly up to the relief valves on their
reactors, and Fukushima was one of them. This was to prevent a hydrogen buildup
in the containment building in the event of a core meltdown, which caused a
minor explosion at Three Mile Island. These stacks are the tall white towers
you see in the photographs of Fukushima, and they are effective in getting rid
of hydrogen buildup, are directly piped, and vent completely outside. “Hard
piped” means that the electrical failures would have had nothing to do with the
blasts, because a hard vent is exactly that – no fan needed at all because the
system is sealed. Even if the hard piping at all 3 fueled Fukushima reactors failed
entirely, it should not have been any worse than Three Mile Island which did
not have any hard venting to begin with. While hydrogen venting might be a
problem if it ignited, it would not mean the death of a facility. It makes no
sense that at Fukushima we got a nuclear weapon style mushroom cloud far in
excess of the highest yield conventional bomb.
Below are the classified
photos
What then, caused the
explosions? The containment walls were at their thinnest points in the lowest
allowed General Electric design a minimum of 4 foot thick steel reinforced
concrete, were likely to be a minimum of 8 feet thick, and were totally blown
away. All concrete was stripped from the rebar, which was left dangling.
Reactor 3 vanished entirely, as seen in the classified photo used to compare
the destruction to the diagram and reactor 4 appears to have been blown to
pieces as seen in this classified photo The yellow dome which should be sitting
on top of reactor 4 can be clearly seen on the wrong side of the containment
building. This type of destruction is is indicative of hard weaponry in use; a
hydrogen air mix will not do that. Reactors are not made out of tinfoil. On top
of this, there was no potential for an explosion at reactor 4 at all, it had
been defueled. SO WHAT, PRAY TELL, BLEW IT APART? That’s the dirty question no
one is asking – how did that happen?
To give you an idea of
how big the reactors at Fukushima were, look at this. It’s the top of the same
make and model at Fukushima’s American twin, TVA owned Brown’s Ferry, and it is
only the top. The yellow dome sits above this, and is even bigger. (here, the
yellow dome has been removed for refueling), over 150 feet of reactor sits
below that cap. Hydrogen will not vaporize that, which appears to be what happened
to #3, only a nuclear weapon would. Reactors are about 14 digits beyond
incapable of going supercritical even with a complete core meltdown. The
reactors did not explode, something placed in their vicinity did.
Magna BSP had access to
the reactors at this facility. They were based in Dimona, which is a military
base that manufactures nuclear weapons. Stuxnet was made in their yard. They
are stated to be a military company.
There is extremely
strong evidence that Dimona based Magna BSP placed nuclear weapons at the
exploded or vanished reactors at Fukushima, possibly hidden inside one of their
unbelievably GIANT stereoscopic cameras. These cameras were installed inside
the reactor containment of Fukushima reactor 3 under the cover of a security
contract in the year prior to the disaster. These cameras are identical in size
and appearance to a gun type nuclear weapon. Since previous hydrogen explosions
at boiling water reactors have never caused any sort of damage to equipment or
buildings, even during complete meltdowns, it begs the question how on earth
one at reactor 3 produced a mushroom cloud. Three Mile Island sits in the
evidence pool against what we have been told about Fukushima. History does
matter.
One problem with the
reporting in the mainstream media is that it failed to convey just how massive
and strong the containment structures really were, as seen in this classified
photo. A hydrogen explosion would only blow the sheet metal off the steel
framed roof if it even did that, at Three Mile Island the hydrogen ignition did
nothing at all. It just scared employees. Another thing the reporting failed to
convey is the gravity of the disaster. Compare the containment diagram to the
remains of reactor 3. It is painfully obvious that many tons of highly
radioactive plutonium in the containment pools is nowhere to be found, the
entire floor they were on is completely gone. We are getting lied to.
That was a LOT more than
a hydrogen blast, and as a result there are thousands of pounds of plutonium
scattered everywhere. TEPCO was ridiculed for initially stating that the
radiation from the facility was “immeasurable”. I think they at first told the
truth. Now they have this story about the Fukushima 50. Is it in fact a “wag
the dog”? No one could be there and live. Why is remote controlled heavy
equipment doing the cleanup? The official story is hydrogen blasts, not nukes,
so the story line has to at least be within the far outer limits of what a
hydrogen blast could actually accomplish; not missing reactors and entire fuel
pools blown away.
I suggest you ponder the
pictures and materials presented and reach your own conclusion. A government
issued training manual for the reactors at Fukushima is here
Now that Osama, who has
been dead for 10 years is officially dead, Al Quaida is going to use a nuke, so
they say; I strongly urge you to consider this article if a nuke actually does
go off somewhere or if other nuclear facilities start acting like Fukushima.
The only reason I
believe the management at Fukushima is not telling it like it really was is
because victim status has been so well asserted by the ethnic group in question
that it is career suicide to point the finger at them, even when they try to
kill you. I find it interesting that all 12 Non-Japanese employees of Magna BSP
returned to Israel a week before the tsunami . . . . .
I might have understood
the need for Stuxnet if it’s use would have ended with Iran. Unfortunately that
does not appear to be the case. I do hope this article breaks their toy.
For those of you who are
reluctant to re-post this because the wording is too strong, I ask you to
consider this;
The real answer came out
of Fukushima. We have a member of the international community which has already
done horrendous damage to a very advanced and (presently) innocent civilization
and we simply cannot continue to tolerate it. Consider what ignoring this will
cost you. Are you prepared to have a major disaster at the convenience of the
couch; because you sat there watching TV rather than dragging your butt over to
the computer to at least spread the word? Are your video games, ball games, 4×4
and porno really worth continuing to lose everything for? Is your religion
going to keep you silent as well? We really need a serious wake up call. Please
let this post be it, rather than some other unforeseen disaster.
Thank you to the many
readers who pointed out flaws, gave tips, and suggested clarifications, you
studied this indeed! My thanks also goes out to the radio hosts who have had me
on the air and invited me to appear to discuss this subject. BTW, this article
was written via code entry, without spell check. Consider that.
These references
included as e-mail compatible links.
www.pinktentacle.com/2011/04/high-resolution-photos-of-fukushima-daiichi/ (source
of high resolution photos)
No comments:
Post a Comment